Under the circumstances described, the undesirable marriage can’t be reestablished because the spouse has married to her new husband.

You are not committed to. The coroner is committed to summon you for the interrogation by a letter of summons (Article 188 Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). However I wouldn’t recommend you to find out who knows the Criminal Procedure Code better, you or the coroner, with your stating to the latter: “Shall talk only after I receive the letter of summons”. In response to your dodge, an experienced and creative coroner can shuffle summon papers so, that he will have all the necessary stuff about your being informed stamped without you knowing it. After all this You can unexpectedly be mandatory taken to court. It is always unpleasant.

That’s why I recommend that you should go to the interrogation. Besides, in this situation you could use some useful attorney’s help, who could accompany you. The law entitles a witness to come to the interrogation with an attorney. Having an attorney with you allows evading wrongdoings coming sometimes from the prosecution (bullying, forcing to give necessary for the prosecution testimony under different pretexts).

During the interrogation you have the right not to witness against yourself and your close relatives. Although if you should use this right or not can be advised to you by your legal attorney.

Property belonging to each spouse before marriage is his property. Separate property is the one, gained during marriage, but for assets being separate or attained after selling separate property. In your case these are two of your apartments bought for money attained by setting your 3 room apartment belonging to you before marriage. But you should also keep in mind that the two apartments bought for your money may be considered mutual property if it is proved that during marriage there has been investment into your apartments, considerably increasing their value (fundamental repair, renovation, and redesign, so on). These investment is to be performed through one of the following sources: a) through mutual property of the spouses; b) through property of each spouse; в) through labor of a spouse.

Children growing and education issues should be settled not from the point of parental right, but from the children right point. You should not compete with your former wife for the son. Even if the court decides in your favor, and if even according to this decision you shall have the right to sped certain hours and days with your son, it won’t settle the issue. It will be very difficult to implement this court decision into practice and have full father – son intercourse if your former wife resists. Our legislation is significantly behind from that of Europe in this respect.

In cases like this, I personally recommend my clients to address to a professional psychologist, not an attorney. Sometimes heated emotions overcome reasonable mind and “struggle for the child” becomes a nightmare, where children suffer first and pay with their psychological and behavioral health damaged.

Referring to children care supervision bodies and appealing to court are extremer measures which you should use only if peaceful negotiating is futile.